<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Shooting at Bubbles - Latest Comments in How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/</link><description>A cranky old fart taking aim at Social Media and new technology with both barrels</description><atom:link href="https://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/how_not_to_be_liked_on_friendfeed/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:39:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/09/13/how-not-to-be-liked-on-friendfeed/#comment-2332835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bravos! Well said. There are some deeper conversations happening in the rooms.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:39:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/09/13/how-not-to-be-liked-on-friendfeed/#comment-2332669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent article Steven!!  I too have noticed that FriendFeed conversation has really polarized around Social Media, Politics, Web based apps - especially pertaining to the latest hot bright shiny 'toy' applications (think startups).  Much of the user base on FF is early adopters who have found a heaven in FF which has become a virtual water cooler to discuss / share about THOSE topics, almost to exclusion of other topics / conversations&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan Beebe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:15:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/09/13/how-not-to-be-liked-on-friendfeed/#comment-2332443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just read feeds NOT about SocNet stuff via RSS. From elsewhere. Because FF is a truly lousy medium for actually being exposed to ongoing comment, discussion, and exploration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At worst it's an overgrown chatroom with threading. At best it's a newsgroup with no focus and lousy filtering tools. Neither of these is good for research, understanding what's going on in the world, or news. That's why Hades invented Google Reader, after all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander "SquidLord" Williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:51:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/09/13/how-not-to-be-liked-on-friendfeed/#comment-2332410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is a valid question about the knee-jerk reaction and I'm not sure I&lt;br&gt;have an answer for you. My supposition is that it probably did to a certain&lt;br&gt;degree just as the inclusion of FriendFeed in the title may have accounted&lt;br&gt;for some of them as well. The only argument I could possibly against that is&lt;br&gt;the readers coming from FriendFeed itself in that they aren't not in my&lt;br&gt;opinion the type of readers given to falling for cheap 'title' manipulation.&lt;br&gt;They actually take the time to read what is being put in front of them and&lt;br&gt;then making their decsions based on that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:48:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/09/13/how-not-to-be-liked-on-friendfeed/#comment-2332224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hah. See most of my articles now. I don't think they even get read anymore since I no longer blog exclusively about Web 2.0 stuff. Most go by with no likes and no comments. It's a very narrow focus there, that's for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CyndyA</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/09/13/how-not-to-be-liked-on-friendfeed/#comment-2332222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the number of likes on either post match with the number of page views coming from FF?  What I'm getting at, is that it seems this Scoble person (I'll assume it's not the Alex one) is pretty important to some people, it seems that everyone is following him, which sorta sets him up as a person to be hated/abused.  Based on your title alone, I think that people would "like" it just as a passive-agressive way of giving Scoble the finger.  Chances are they didn't read either post or only read one of the other, but I do wonder how much of that "like" on the second post was knee-jerk because of the title.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anika Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:25:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/09/13/how-not-to-be-liked-on-friendfeed/#comment-2332153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Critical thinking ftw&lt;br&gt;Nice piece, Steven. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now please excuse me. I have to go follow my followers baaaaaah baaaaaaaaah. HA ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mona Nomura</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>