<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Shooting at Bubbles - Latest Comments in I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/</link><description>A cranky old fart taking aim at Social Media and new technology with both barrels</description><atom:link href="https://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/i_really_want_my_readers_opinion_on_this/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:31:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-684337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Steven, I'm sure this helped you in your decision! As for me, I'm a new tab/new window person. Since there are passionate views on both sides of this issue, I guess the safest thing is to open in the same window, and follow Duncan's advice re manually opening things in a new window/tab on a case by case basis.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ontarioemperor</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:31:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-682674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;acedanger, looks like disqus handled the URL poorly, should be: &lt;a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html"&gt;http://www.useit.com/alertb...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Trapp</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:51:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-682630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, I got a 404 on the link.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">acedanger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:38:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-682626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like links to open in a new tab, so I can continue reading (or whatever I'm doing) the rest of the page before I move onto whatever was linked.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">acedanger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-682381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;prefer when it opens in the same tab, as I can always open any link in background by pressing middle mouse button or pressing ctrl+shift. a new window is a sucker imo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sasha Kovaliov aka nlupus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 05:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-681103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In a new tab. That way I can continue to work in the existing window while the new tab (window) continues to load and when I am done with the existing window I can move to the new tab and work with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:11:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-679376</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I have my browser configured to open all pop-ups in a new tab.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:06:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same window. If I want links to open in a new tab/window I want it to be a conscious decision by me. All points raised by Mark Trapp are valid, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carsten</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The same window I guess because I select a new tab with middle click if I want one (which I often do). Though thinking aloud, in FriendBinder, I make external links go to new tab/window and internal links stay in the same window - so I would be interested to see if I should change that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:48:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn't matter to me, really. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Pirillo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:07:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678505</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same window. Nothing worse than a new window opening, and if I want a new window (or a new tab which I regularly do) I can right click and do it on a case by case basis&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Duncan Riley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;large parts of the world have a slow connection&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i want to click, but keep reading, so always go for open in another tab&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregory</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't care really, because I always middle-click links, to open them in a new tab. I guess, if I had to choose I would pick the same window, so like Mark Trapp says, it doesn't break the back button. Anyway, if a site is worth staying on, I will open any links in a new tab, so it probably won't make a difference either way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a writer in the past I have always had my outgoing links open in new windows, but I wonder if that is kind of jerkish of me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jonsterling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same window, for a few reasons: 1) you don't break the back button. 2) You let me control how I want to view your content, and 3) what Jakob Nielsen says about it (url: &lt;a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html):" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html):"&gt;http://www.useit.com/alertb...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Opening up new browser windows is like a vacuum cleaner sales person who starts a visit by emptying an ash tray on the customer's carpet. Don't pollute my screen with any more windows, thanks (particularly since current operating systems have miserable window management).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Designers open new browser windows on the theory that it keeps users on their site. But even disregarding the user-hostile message implied in taking over the user's machine, the strategy is self-defeating since it disables the Back button which is the normal way users return to previous sites. Users often don't notice that a new window has opened, especially if they are using a small monitor where the windows are maximized to fill up the screen. So a user who tries to return to the origin will be confused by a grayed out Back button.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Links that don't behave as expected undermine users' understanding of their own system. A link should be a simple hypertext reference that replaces the current page with new content. Users hate unwarranted pop-up windows. When they want the destination to appear in a new page, they can use their browser's "open in new window" command -- assuming, of course, that the link is not a piece of code that interferes with the browser’s standard behavior."&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Trapp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:45:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I strongly agree with Daniel as well. I wonder if that would make for an interesting way to design a poll - along the lines of "agree", "strongly agree", etc. It could be that the (current) minority who prefer control feel somewhat passionate about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddmck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;New tab for me. I don't like having so many windows crowding my taskbar. Though it is easier for me to remember the keyboard shortcut to switch windows rather than switch tabs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida Raven</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same window. More important to my browsing experience  is "cool iris previews"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian Baldwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you know, I have a very similar question on my blog poll rotation.  Along with a bunch of stupid questions ;).  My answer is more complex than simply "new window" or "same window".  These are my preferences:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a browser that doesn't support tabs, I want my links to open in the same window.  I get annoyed if new windows open when I click a link.&lt;br&gt;In a browser that supports tabs, and allows links with targets to open in a new tab, I prefer this behavior.  I get annoyed if a link moves me off of the page I am currently on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, I want all links to open a new tab, but never in a new window.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, I do realize that browsers have a modifier to force opening a link in a new window or tab, but no modifier to force the reverse.  So, no matter what the preference, to err on the side of caution would be to not add a target to any href.  Note that I don't do this on my blog.  I'm thinking about it though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:53:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-678048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same window. CHeck out any major site - cnet, new york times, google, all results link to same window. My philosophy is - that's the default behavior of a link - a href is same window. To make it different means adding something which means it's altering the default behavior.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-677925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I strongly agree with Daniel. I believe the default should be to open in the same window. If I want to stay on the same page, I can choose to open the link in a new tab. It's the only way that the user has complete control.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaeltwofish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:07:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-677603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I, generally, like for links to stay in the same window. This gives me the option of cmd-clicking them into a new tab or whatever if that's the behaviour I want. If they always open in a new window it removes my ability to control where they go. However, if it is a site I primarily use on my iPhone, I sometimes like to specify new window.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:13:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-677542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My personal preference is for all external links to open in a  new window or tab.  I subscribe to this practice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Fruchter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:50:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-677496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ditto.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:35:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-677442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the threaded ideal of tabbed browsing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matik72</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:15:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I really want my readers opinion on this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/14/i-really-want-my-readers-opinion-on-this/#comment-677434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want everything to open in a new window/tab because I don't want to lose what I'm reading. My take is that you included the link at a specific point in your post to help me understand what you're writing about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't want to open a link and then get lost cuz you linked me to something interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I want to be able to hit C-w a few times and end up back at your article. I don't want to have to navigate my browser history.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rahsheen </dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:11:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>