<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Shooting at Bubbles - Latest Comments in Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/</link><description>A cranky old fart taking aim at Social Media and new technology with both barrels</description><atom:link href="https://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/serious_conversations_not_on_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:39:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17742549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm going to start a series on the dumb DMs and spam that I'm getting on Twitter. Should be fun exposing them. One of the worst offenders is SocialBlaster. They are very adept at link-baiting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blog Bloke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:39:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17720030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that Twitter is not the "conversation" medium that some people use it for...when I am two or three tweets in, I either tell them to email or call. &lt;br&gt;For content, Twitter is fantastic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jlo0312</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17695492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel ripped-off and want my money back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Baskind</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17693620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely true. The only time you can get close to having a cohesive conversation is to use a #hashtag, which is a huge PITA and cuts into your 140. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rahsheen </dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17693526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't even want to try doing anything like that especially when it comes to a popular program like FeedDemon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:07:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17693499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;not to mention that the whole crowdsourcing hype about it is just that hype unless you have very large numbers of followers. The number of times that I have put out a question or asked for help for something and that I have gotten a reply other than spam I can count on one hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17692850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that's the same reason I just can't do tech support on Twitter.  Not enough room to really figure things out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nbradbury</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:45:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17654005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. Twitter is best for one-way communication.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:39:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17647660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i've stumbled upon that roadblock many a time. some form of google mail style conversations would be helpful, but then again, it's not really keeping in line with the usual 'im making toast' pearls that we see flying around on twitter...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">randommanblog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:13:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serious conversations? Not on Twitter</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/27/serious-conversations-not-on-twitter/#comment-17647511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't agree more. I wrote a similar article not long ago and Twitter's old-school SMS technology doesn't cut it and totally SUCKS as a conversation tool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blog Bloke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>