-
Website
http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/ -
Original page
http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2007/12/15/vista-copymove-the-service-pack-1-rc1-follow-up/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
joemontana
37 comments · 1 points
-
Shey
29 comments · 43 points
-
webomatica
46 comments · 5 points
-
Arni
52 comments · 4 points
-
StevenHodson
1028 comments · 66 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Every other issue i have seen has been strictly 3rd party driver related. This was the same thing that happened with xp, its popular to bash MS, and as for you mac fans....grow a brain, its just a pc, no difference, just a much higher markup on parts, and a tiny bit of code to allow mac os, a weak OS full of security flaws no one cares to exploit. Put another dollar in steve jobs pocket, get your macbook, and when you power it up and get online, take a look at apples profit, profit = markup. You are not getting a good deal if the company is making huge profit. Dell sells PC's at a loss, they lose money on every system shipped and make it up in warranty sells.
Learn before spreading FUD, and in two years when you are still trying to squeeze the last bit of life from 32bit xp, you will be missing out on the key elements that make vista the power house it is, a la dx10, better memory management, not to mention a highly stable, highly recoverable OS.
Do yourselves a favor, when you encounter a problem, google it, learn instead of spreading ignorance. There are many wonderful guides online. I hope eventually people stop moaning about UAC, the whole purpose is to have one admin with multiple users(running limited accounts), if they need administrative access it can be temporarily granted using UAC.....if you are a single user of the system and have enough of a brain to spell UAC, TURN IT OFF.
Which is too bad because I do like Vista even with all its bloat and heaviness on eye candy.
Thanks for stopping by Jack and adding your 2 cents.
What about Microsoft's mark up? It's even worse. Like you said "You are not getting a good deal if the company is making huge profit."
I find comments like yours to be arrogant and stink of American superiority, but then again, I may just be overly sensitive about having to pay $700 to get a legit OS that's broken and doesn't work properly, and then having people tell me that I simply need to do "some research"
That is just blatantly false. The compatibility issues are almost unbelievable in Vista, whether it's in "compatibility mode" or otherwise. Microsoft makes no such claim, in fact there is a seemingly infinite list of applications not compatible with Vista. Do your homework.
I have a monster laptop for work - it's an HP nw9440 workstation with 4GB of RAM, 2.16 GHz dual core - because I do a significant amount of work with virtual machines in my job as a systems architect.
With XP it was blazingly fast and nice as any MS product can be. Under Vista with HPs most up to date drivers it is a painfully, pitifully slow, worthless piece of crap.
I thought about "upgrading" back to XP, but the entire situation just pissed me off. The largest software manufacturer in the world, with billions in resources and tens of thousands of employees managed to screw up their own frickin' flagship OS so bad as to render it basically unusable for real work.
So, with the permission of the boss, I have switched my core OS to Ubuntu 7.10 and couldn't be happier. I run a XP VM for the things that I can't run under Linux, but I have found that list to be vanishingly short since I usually remote into Windows boxes to work anyway.
I'm working on getting a MacBook Pro, but the boss might draw the line at that. In the meantime, I've removed all MS OS's from all of my home computers except the wife. She's holding out for a MacBook :^)
Wham Bam thank you madam - it was done.
40 seconds .. and Vista couldn't do even 39,000 days.
Yes, current Mac hardware uses Intel processors and is essentially "the same" as any other PC hardware. The difference is, you get the superior OS X operating system bundled with it. It's not even legal to install OS X on anything that's not real Mac hardware. The two are supposed to be purchased as a hardware/software combo (which isn't SO different from what Microsoft already does anyway with these OEM Windows licenses you can't legally separate from whichever PC they came with).
If I buy a Dell, I get crappy phone support from India or Romania, and 45 minutes on hold just to do the "song and dance" of unplugging the PC, plugging it back in, telling the "tech" on the phone that yes, a green light does still come on when I press the power button, etc. etc. - before I can even RMA a bad monitor or something. With Apple, they're consistently top-rated for their level of customer service and satisfaction. Yes, I've had things go bad on my Macbook Pro. But it was handled in 10 minutes on the phone, and the repaired machine was shipped off, repaired, and returned in under 48 hours total! Apple even went above and beyond what was required, replacing a loose display hinge that wasn't covered as a "warranty" item to begin with.
And all in all, the Apple computers I've owned are ALL built to better standards than any other Windows PCs I've used, barring perhaps a "server class PC". The "fit and finish" is above-average, and attention was paid to all the details. (EG. Slot loading DVD drives on laptops so you have no annoying tray that slides out and can break off or get in your way on a cramped desk.)
Lastly, if I really feel the *need* for Windows (XP or Vista), the current Mac OS X version lets me dual-boot into either of them on my Mac anyway! So far, except for a few games though, I avoid doing that. OS X is just far more pleasant to use.
The way I see it, WinXP was pretty much useless too when it was first released, people were ranting about how Win2K was superior. Microsoft will get the OS together at some point.
Better confess that I am running Vista on my desktop and my tablet PC with no problems (except for at few BSoD here and there, but I get those on XP aswell), and im very pleased with the OS overall.
http://www.stardock.com/products/windowblinds/
I still have not run into the situation as you have described but at least it is something to be aware of.
Good work.