<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Shooting at Bubbles - Latest Comments in Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/</link><description>A cranky old fart taking aim at Social Media and new technology with both barrels</description><atom:link href="https://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/why_today8217s_solo_bloggers_may_not_see_scoble_like_fame8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:30:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with this.  But why shouldn't independent group blogs or blog networks thrive by leveraging the same dynamics of a RWW or Venture Beat?  Of course its hard to have a clear distinctive voice as a group because it requires more coordination than a solo blogger.  I don't think biggest will always win...there is always opportunity for a small squad of bloggers working together to break through the noise.  Look at you, @corvida, @louisgray...  more cross-promotion could create a virtual Venture Beat or RWW from a group of solo bloggers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">elliottng</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:30:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No Corvida I would want to be myself. Fame doesn't mean you have to "suck up" to anyone but it can mean that your words, thoughts and ideas can have an effect - can really make people think - can have an impact. It doesn't have to be "famewhoring" but it can be bringing people together to effect a change - to be a voice that is listened to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fame is a tricky beast and in many ways it gives the wrong connation to what I wanted to express but sometime the English language can fail us when we need it the most.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would you want to be Scoble? I sure wouldn't. All that constant famewhoring and being "on" all the time. Don't get me wrong; I love tech, but I don't live it and breathe it, and I certainly don't want to have to suck up to the Twitterati constantly. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CyndyA</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Much of the conversation is now taking place off of blogs at places like Twitter and FriendFeed. This makes it easier for new voices to build a following, it just isn't all concentrated on their blogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wesley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ROFL I severely doubt anyone would want to hire a cranky old fart who can't spell worth a damn :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree - FF has introduced me to more new writers (at least new to me) than anything else lately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for somebody hiring me: I wouldn't be surprised if somebody hired Steven long before me :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frederic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:00:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would definitely agree with you there Robert that is one reason why I referred to FF as a bloggers personal newswire service if used properly in another post&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-350170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FriendFeed is doing a lot more to get exposure to new people and new ideas than anything else I've seen out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-349887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Contract negotiations taking up your time??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:47:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-349883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just trying to do my part for the greater good of the blogosphere :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-349828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louis who? That guy hasn't posted since Tuesday! Slacker.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:26:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why today&amp;#8217;s solo bloggers may not see Scoble-like fame&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/04/17/why-todays-solo-bloggers-may-not-see-scoble-like-fame/#comment-349821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, oh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sounds like the "The A-List Exists" Meme is rearing its ugly head again!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(checks watch) -- its about time, actually. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tonyhung</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:24:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>